Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Q & A


To begin this lengthy post I'll throw up some doodles from my pocket moleskine book.

Michael Rakov, a Russian journalist located in Saint Petersburg contacted me by email and asked if I would answer a few questions for mymoleskine.ru. So, of course I said yes.

The interview in russian is here.

For kicks & giggles I used babelfish (knowing from previous uses that it could prove quite hilarious) to translate it back to English from Russian. That translation went as follows...

MIKHAIL [RAKOV] ON AUGUST 23, 2011

I fight simply because I fight, said [Portos]. The Texas artist Of allen Of sutton speaks approximately also the very: “I sketch simply because I sketch”. But they trained it to this grand-dad with the grandmother: “they constantly required that I would sketch only the children and the flowers. And when I once this made, it, you do see, it was wanted so that my psycho-tank plants would end to devour babies. Somehow so everything began”, recalls Allen.

Why you do sketch precisely into Moleskine?

I tried hundreds of different notebooks and albums. But in all of them there was one and the same deficiency - too thin a paper. Paste always flowed. Remained spots on the even cleaner sheets of paper - by word, it is terrifically inconvenient.

Then it tried to sketch on the dense [printernoy] paper. Like, everything is good, but indeed the same not notebook, but the simply separate leaves. On the whole, also troubles there was much. And the pair of years ago I found several artists, who used Moleskine. Naturally, it decided to try. It purchased. In the sense, Moleskine. And in this notebook to me at first glance everything was pleased. Immediately. The sensation of paper, solid cover, [rezinochka] - is simple fantasy. Since then I use only [im].

It most of all me pleases to sketch into Moleskine of large size. There dense paper; therefore paste does not flow to another page. Then knob slides along this paper as oil on the glass.

To of course constantly drag with itself enormous notebook - is not too convenient. Therefore I purchased to itself even and pocket, small Moleskine for the small sketchings.

But that this after heroes on your works?

They do not have names. It is simple fools. Honestly speaking, I cannot explain nature of their appearance, why they are concrete such, and not here such. I simply sketch, this goes from my subconsciousness. Probably, therefore they are constant and [sovershabt] some absurd, inadequate actions.

How was formed your style?

Well, I grew on [multikakh], comics, science fiction, video games - although this standard collection, me this nevertheless inspired. More lately it worked in the store of comics. Here there I saw the work of the staggering artists. This from the feet to the head overturned my ideas about the skill.

You do sketch simply for the pleasure?

My Moleskine - this as paper packets in the aircraft. When to you it is bad, you take them, spit out in it your dinner - to you more easily. Here and i have approximately the same therapy - to sketch. The large part of the time I this make without some of the final goal. Simply I lay out to the paper everything which occurs. For this very reason in the works so much absurdity and strange heroes. In my opinion this is gay. This makes possible for me to remain in the tone and not to become [psikhom].

Why you on one picture something do make in the color, and something you do leave black and white?

Here everything is simple. Something in the work simply it shouts “paint me! ”, but something is not. Honestly speaking, the majority of my works - complete crap. When I see that in me the complete astrakmans are obtained, I attempt to repair - I add a little color. Astrakman- that they remain astrakmans, but now, also, in the color.

- A why you do put “verbal bubbles” as in the comics? For which?

- Well, probably in order to add somewhat sense, components. But can in order to embellish any of character. I I obtain unspeakable of pleasure putting different small jokes in the dialogues. And, by the way, about the comics. I made their whole ton. In the school in me was this character - cosmonaut. I made with it 26 series, and he then sold to classmates. All this, of course, complete nonsense, but it was gay. I, until now, make any illustrations I, true, constantly somewhere lose them. But generally, me it would be desirable independently something to write, to illustrate and to publish.

End.

So needless to say, I got a good laugh out of it, wishing I could have composed such surreal grandeur on my own.

It felt weird answering questions about myself, but a thanks goes to Michael Rakov for the unique opportunity, and a thanks to Mario Rodriguez for the use of his photo of me for the Q&A.

Hot Dang, this is a long post.

1 comments:

  1. It looks much more funny being translated back to russian by google translate =)

    Great pics, man. Really like the way you do them.

    ReplyDelete